Latest Photos

Hindu Hindu Christianity Christianity Hindu Christianity Hindu Islam Islam Islam
Search this blog..

Top Stories of the week

Our Link Partners

Link Exchange? Click Here

Understanding Hinduism

Posted in : Hinduism

(added last year!)

Column by NS Rajaram – Essence of Hinduism is spiritual freedom. It has no dogma or concept of heresy. Defending and nurturing spiritual freedom is the ideal that sustains India as a nation. India is the sacred land for those who revere this freedom. The first point to note is that the word ‘Hinduism’, like ‘India’ is of foreign origin. For people living outside India, especially in the Middle East, a Hindu is anyone who lives in India— which they see as the land beyond the Sindhu (Indus) River. In countries as far apart as Iran and Turkey, they refer to India as ‘Hindustan’ and to Indians as Hindus. They see it as a nationality and not a religion.

Further, Hinduism cannot be viewed as religion deriving its authority from a book or the teachings of a founder. The appropriate term for what we now call Hinduism is ‘Sanatana Dharma’. It is not a creed like Christianity or Islam, but a code of conduct and a value system that has spiritual freedom as its core. Any pathway or spiritual vision that accepts the spiritual freedom of others may be considered part of Sanatana Dharma. As Sri Aurobindo described it, Sanatana Dharma is also the basis of Indian nationalism.

This brings up another important facet of Sanatana Dharma or Hinduism: it is apaurusheya, which means it is not originate in any man (purusha). That is to say it has no historical founder like Christianity has Jesus and Islam has Prophet Muhammad. We can say that Jesus is the purusha of Christianity while Muhammad is the purusha of Islam. These religions cannot exist without their founders. Christianity and Islam are therefore paurusheya. Hinduism has no such purusha on whose authority it exists.

Hinduism is apaurusheya in a deeper sense also, which brings it close to science, and brings its spiritual quest close to the scientific method. In paurusheya religions, the word of the purusha (the founder) — be it Jesus or Muhammad — must be accepted without question. This gives rise to an enforcing authority known as the clergy to ensure that no one deviates from the ‘true path’ as shown by the founder, but in reality as enforced by the human representative who claims to be the true spokesman of the purusha. This naturally leads to men exercising political power in the name of God. This is what we call theocracy. The authority is the scripture, which is said to represent the word of God as conveyed through his medium or the purusha. As I shall soon explain, in this scheme, the medium invariably becomes more important than God. For example, it is Jesus not his God that defines Christianity.

Hinduism on the other hand leaves the individual free from any religious authority. If any work is considered great, it is because of the message and not the messenger. Similarly, a teacher is considered great because of the greatness of the teaching. For example, Vishwamitra is considered a great sage because of the greatness of the Gayatri Mantra, which he enunciated. If someone else than Vishwamitra had given us the Gayatri Mantra, it would still be considered great because of its message. It is the same with Krishna and the Gita. It is the message of the Gita that has led to people reveringKrishna as a great teacher. Also, a Hindu is free to question or reject any part or all of a religious work.

This feature— of focusing on the message and its truth rather than the authority of the messenger brings Sanatana Dharma close to science and the scientific method. In science also, a principle or a theory must stand or fall on its own merit and not on the authority of anyone. If Newton and Einstein are considered great scientists, it is because of the validity of their scientific theories. In that sense, science is also apaurusheya. Gravitation and Relativity are eternal laws of nature that existed long before Newton and Einstein. These are cosmic laws that happened to be discovered by scientific sages Newton and Einstein. Their greatness lies in the fact that they discovered and revealed great scientific truths. But no one invokes Newton or Einstein as authority to ‘prove’ the truth of laws of nature. They stand on their own merit. The same is true of the Gita and the Gayatri Mantra.

Hinduism recognizes the freedom of the individual. It recognizes no prophet’s claim as the possessor of the ‘only’ truth or the ‘only’ way.

This is probably the greatest difference between Sanatana Dharma and revealed religions like Christianity and Islam. I can illustrate this with the help of a recent proclamation by the Vatican. In a just released document titled “Declaration of Lord Jesus” the Vatican proclaims non-Christians to be in a “gravely deficient situation” and that even non-Catholic churches have “defects” because they do not acknowledge the primacy of the Pope. This of course means that the Vatican refuses to acknowledge the spiritual right of others (including Hindus) to their beliefs and practices. This consigns non-Christians to hell, and the only way they can save themselves is by becoming Catholics, by submitting to the Pope.

One who believes in God but does not accept Jesus or Muhammad as intermediary is still considered a non-believer and therefore a sinner. They simply do not tolerate pluralism. This is what makes both Christianity and Islam exclusive. The rejection of this formulation is also what makes Hinduism pluralistic and tolerant.

From this it is clear that what governs a revealed religion is not God but the founder who claims to be God’s intermediary. (The clergy acting in the founder’s name becomes the enforcing authority or the thought police.) A believer is one who accepts the intermediary as the savior. God is irrelevant. He is even dispensable but not the intermediary. Hinduism recognizes no intermediary as the exclusive messenger of God. In fact the Rigveda itself says: ‘ekam sat, vipra bahuda vadanti,’ meaning “cosmic truth is one, but the wise express it in many ways.” The contrast between exclusivism and pluralism becomes clear when we compare the following statements byKrishna and Jesus Christ.

Krishna of the Bhagavadgita says: “All creatures great and small— I am equal to all. I hate none nor have I any favorites… He that worships other gods with devotion, worships me.”

This means that Krishna has no favorites and accepts all forms of worship— even worship of other deities. But revealed religions like Christianity and Islam could not exist without favorites or intermediaries like the Prophet or the Son of God. The Bible says that God is jealous. Reflecting the ‘jealous God’ of the Bible, the chosen intermediary is also jealous. This is reflected in both the Bible and the Koran. “He that is not with me is against me,” says Jesus of the Bible (Matthew 12.30) . So a devotee cannot know God, but can only go through the intermediary who jealously guards his exclusive access to God.

Hinduism is the exact opposite of this. Anyone can know God and no jealous intermediary blocks his way. And the Hindu tradition has methods like yoga and meditation to facilitate one to reach God. Further, this spiritual freedom extends even to atheism. One can be an agnostic oven an atheist and still claim to be a Hindu.

In addition, there is nothing to stop a Hindu from revering Jesus as the Son of God or Muhammad as a Prophet. In contrast, a Christian or a Muslim revering Rama or Krishna as an avatar would be rejected as a heretic. This is also what makes Christianity and Islam exclusive, and Hinduism pluralistic and inclusive.

From this it is also clear why revealed religions always claim to be monotheistic: One God allows only One Intermediary. So every monotheistic religion also tends to be monopolistic. It also requires a thought police to enforce this belief system, just as every earthly dictator does. So they invariably become theocratic political systems. In contrast, in Hinduism, God is internal to the seeker. As a result each seeker has his or his own version of God. Different traditions like Dvaita, Advaita and others represent different pathways. They exercise no authority and there is no clergy to enforce.

Hinduism and spiritual freedom

So the single most important theme of Hinduism is the freedom of the spirit. Just as science insists on freedom in exploring the physical world, Sanatana Dharma embodies freedom in the exploration of the spiritual realm. There are no dogmas or prophets — or their agents — to block the way. This allows Hinduism, like science, to grow and evolve with time. Dogmatic religions on the other hand are frozen in time. (In fact, a good deal of the effort by the priesthood in Islam and Christianity is to ensure that the original teachings do not become corrupted due to change.)

This freedom of spirit is most concisely expressed in the famous Gayatri Mantra, which prays: dhiyo yo nah pracodayat— which means, “Inspire our intellect.” So the greatest prayer in Hinduism is for clarity of thinking. It does not ask anyone to accept anything on blind faith in a prophet or any other agent of God. Teachers in Hinduism are only guides who suggest pathways. They have no authority. The seeker has to find his or her own way, with the help of guides if needed.

In the light of this, ‘conversion’ to Hinduism entails accepting a way of looking at the world and not simply changing faith and adopting a new mode of worship. Above all it means acknowledging spiritual freedom and rejecting exclusivism. It is like accepting the scientific method, which also is a way of looking at the world. It cannot be done by force or with promises of profit. Learning about Sanatana Dharma can be done in several ways. By studying various works like the Vedas, Upanishads and the Gita, with the guidance of a teacher, or by studying the lives of sages and heroes in the epics and the Puranas. It may also be gained through personal experience by meditation and yoga. But ultimately, every Hindu must place truth and knowledge above faith. There is no dogma. This is why people who are initiated into Hinduism are made to recite the Gayatri Mantra, which is an assertion of this spirit of intellectual freedom.

As a result, it is a very great error to say that all religions say the same thing. They emphatically do not. When Krishna says, “Those who worship other gods with devotion worship me,” and Jesus says, “He that is not with me is against me,” they are not saying the same thing. A Hindu is one who holds on to this belief system and code founded on the right of everyone to spiritual freedom, while Christianity and Islam reject and even punish this freedom. The method of worship and the deity or deities one may choose to worship are secondary as long one acknowledges everyone’s right to this freedom and is prepared to defend it. So the only enemies of Sanatana Dharma are those that oppose spiritual freedom. Protecting and nurturing Sanatana Dharma and the society founded on it is the responsibility of Hindu nationalism. Spiritual freedom is a right that carries with the responsibility of defending it.

Read the rest of this entry »

(added last year!) / 198 views

A Grand Multi-Day Hindu Festival of Yoga & Music in Colorado

Posted in : Hinduism

(added last year!)

A Grand Multi-Day Hindu Festival of Yoga & Music in ColoradoAn elaborate “Hanuman Festival” of yoga and music will be held at Boulder (Colorado, USA) from June 8-10. “VIP Pass” for this “three-day celebration of yoga, music and community” costs $1,099 and it claims to offer “world-class yoga instructors, mind-blowing music, inspirational experiences and a nourishing community” at the foot of Colorado’s Rocky Mountains. “Immerse yourself in body, mind and heart as you relax and rejuvenate, dance and devote, connect and expand, have fun and just be…”, its announcement adds.

Hindu statesman Rajan Zed, in a statement in Nevada (USA) today, lauded the efforts of Hanuman Festival organizers for spreading awareness about Lord Hanuman, greatly revered by Hindus; and celebrating yoga, a world heritage and liberation powerhouse introduced and nourished by Hinduism but meant to be utilized by all.

Zed, who is President of Universal Society of Hinduism, urged the organizers to use part of the revenues from the Festival to raise a Lord Hanuman Temple in Boulder. Son of wind-god, Hanuman, besides incredible strength and changing shape at will and flying, was believed to be a perfect grammarian, great scholar and excelled in all the sciences. According to a legend, even while he was still an infant, he intimidated the sun. According to a belief, all the planets were under his control, Zed explained.

This “community-oriented yoga and music festival” will offer workshops in Vinyasa, Kundalini, Hatha, Ashtanga and Therapeutic styles of yoga; “creating a holistic yoga experience”. “Yogic, heart centered music” will fill the air by a music line-up which includes “Desert Dwellers”, DJ Drez, White Swan artists, besides kirtan chants of David Newman (Durga Das). This celebratory “Hanuman Festival’s mission is to practice true SEVA, and give to our local and global community”, Festival announcement states.

Rajan Zed asks yoga fans to explore the spiritual dimension of yoga also, because actually yoga is a mental and physical discipline by means of which the human-soul (jivatman) unites with universal-soul (parmatman). According to Patanjali, author of the basic text, the Yoga Sutra, yoga is a methodical effort to attain perfection, through the control of the different elements of human nature, physical and psychical. Yoga is one of the six schools of orthodox Hindu philosophy, take a look at the rest of the five schools also, Zed suggests.

Yoga retreats, some charging as much as $4495, are becoming popular world over. According to a recent research by Bloomberg Rankings, “the potential cost for a woman living in New York to start practicing yoga and to continue for one year” came to $10,779. About 16 million Americans, including many celebrities, are said to practice yoga.

Read the rest of this entry »

(added last year!) / 353 views

On The Origins Of Islam And The Kabbalah

Posted in : Islam

(added last year!)

This is not the first time it is being suggested that parts of the Qur'an (Koran) were authored by an alien. It seems the Qur'an contains scientific information that could not have been known in Muhammad's (Mohammed's) time and that was subsequently proven to be correct. This lies in sharp contrast to biblical science, which has been generally shown to be erroneous.

But the present article has nothing to do with science. It merely concerns a prolonged investigation of medieval mysticism. According to cryptically-written accounts, in the late sixth century A.D. or thereabouts, Elijah the Prophet twice returned to Earth in his chariot, delivering to Judaic scholars in a Babylonian desert, first, the Book of Light (prophetic poems written in Latin), and then the Book of Abraham (a mathematical summary of creation written in Hebrew). Medieval writings insinuate that those two books had a profound impact on Judaism: the Book of Abraham's unrelenting praise of Hebrew led to the resurrection of Hebrew as a living language, and possession of the Book of Light (the luminous presence of the exile) reinforced Jewish resolve against pressure to convert to Islam or Christianity while the textual contents of this book inspired the migration of mystics from the Middle East to specific parts of Europe.

Anyway, the moral of this story is that Muhammad's encounter with the archangel Gabriel may not have been an isolated incident. Out of the secret world of Jewish mysticism (Kabbalah) come signs that around the time of Muhammad the early mystics had similar-type encounters with the prophet Elijah in nearby Babylonia. The prophet and the angel were both described as luminous, and each glorified the Lord in imperious voice. There's more. The Book of Light was a masterpiece of Latin poetry, the Book of Abraham exemplified use of twenty-two letter Hebrew, and the Qur'an set standards for the Arabic language. All three have surprised scholars on linguistic grounds. Beyond this and other considerations, the Qur'an directly mentions the Book of Abraham, though to this day Muslims seem to have little notion about what book the Qur'an is referring to.

The opening sentence of the Book of Abraham reads as follows: "Into thirty-two mysterious paths of wisdom did (he/it) engrave Yah, Lord of the Legions, God of Israel, God of Life, King of Ages, Almighty God, Creator of Good, Dwelling in the Heights, Dwelling in Eternity, Holy Be His Name, and create (his/its) world with three books: written, numerical, and verbal." Medieval mystics correctly identified the numerical rendering as pertaining to the Book of Abraham itself, and they correctly identified the written rendering as pertaining to the Book of Light (deemed written in heaven by the archangel Metatron). For the verbal rendering, however, they concluded that it had to be the Book of Moses, now deemed to have been verbally dictated to Moses on Mount Sinai. But that makes little sense. Moses was too distant in time to be part of singular authorship of the three books. The verbal rendering therefore has to be the Qur'an, verbally transmitted to Muhammad on the Mountain of Light.

The above paragraphs constitute a synthesis of information gathered from dozens of sources. Heavily consulted were the Sefer ha-Bahir, particularly chapters on the Works of the Chariot, and the writings of Gershom Scholem, especially sections that refer to the Revelations of Elijah (another name of the Book of Light). Meanwhile, a vivid description of the desert scene in Babylonia was found in a Spanish translation of Saadia Gaon's Commentary on the Sefer Yetzirah (another name of the Book of Abraham). In contrast to these obscure sources, information on Muhammad and the origins of Islam is widely available on the Internet.

Mystic literature (including variant versions of the Book of Abraham) is contradictory on which book, the Book of Light or the Book of Abraham, was delivered on Elijah's first descent and which one on his second descent. Likewise, the amount of time that transpired between the two descents, whether it was hours, days, or years, is unclear. The Book of Light (private reconstruction) speaks of celestial descent coming after 580 A.D. but is otherwise silent on these issues. Unreliable indications from a later (16th century) but nonetheless well-informed source give the year 585 A.D. for delivery of the Book of Light (which seems plausible in light of the Geonim of Babylonia beginning in 589 A.D.) and 606 or 607 A.D. for the Book of Abraham. Thus, by these measures, the prophet Elijah preceded the archangel Gabriel.

Read the rest of this entry »

(added last year!) / 263 views

Spiritual Significance Of Lizards In Hinduism!

Posted in : Hinduism

(added last year!)

Spiritual Significance Of Lizards In Hinduism!When lizards enter your house, you either get scared or feel the urge to throw the animal out of the house. Did you know that lizards have a spiritual significance in different cultures? In many cultures, lizards have a symbolic meaning. In Hinduism, animals have been frequently mentioned in the myths and legends as a vehicle of God and Goddesses.

For some, lizards are considered as a lucky omen and for some, it is vice-versa. According to Hinduism, lizard chirping is considered holy and auspicious. For example, in Hinduism, lizards falling on the body parts have special symbolism and significance in spirituality.

Check out the spiritual significance of lizards falling on different body parts in Hinduism: If the lizard falls on the head, it symbolizes that the individual should be prepared for a rebellion caused by someone who has disturbed the peace of mind. According to Hinduism, if a lizard falls on the hair, it symbolizes that the person will gain something very soon.

If the lizard falls on the face, it means that the individual will have a guest or relative at home. Lizard falling on the upper lip means loss of wealth but if the animal falls on the lower lip, the person will get wealth!
Lizards falling on the body parts such as neck symbolizes destruction of enemies. If a lizard falls on the left arm, it conveys a message that there is a sensual enjoyment whereas in right arm, it indicates that the person will fall ill.

Lizard falling on the naval indicates gain of something precious. If the lizard falls on the nails, in Hinduism, it means loss of wealth. If a lizard falls on the back, it means destruction and on buttocks, it will bring general good or money gain. On many people, lizards fall on the feet or toes. If the lizard falls on either the feet or toe, in Hinduism, it represents fear or some bad luck. These are few spiritual significance of lizard falling on the body parts. In Hinduism, if lizards enter the house, few cultures believe that it is an avatar of Goddess Lakshmi.

Read the rest of this entry »

(added last year!) / 278 views

Islam: Clothe Women and Children With Kindness

Posted in : Islam

(added last year!)

Hurrah! Pakistan has criminalized domestic violence against women and children. Offenders will face a minimum of six months behind bars and 100,000 rupees in fines.

Every time I hear news of a man using physical force on his wife and children, I become furious to the extent that my face turns red. For a man to react this way is deemed strange. For some God forsaken reason it is widely accepted that it's a man's prerogative to correct women by force, especially if they are ungrateful (whatever that means) and if they don't obey the commands of their husbands.

Women who have been in such situations tell me that a wife can be beaten up for something as trivial as excessively salting food.

What astonishes me is the feedback I get on having strong views against domestic violence. While men try to justify abusive acts by putting the blame on the hypothetical woman for making the man go berserk, women tend to give me sympathetic looks, assuming that, perhaps, I grew up seeing my mother battered.

In reality, my upbringing -- which was predominantly happy, thank God -- has nothing to do with my views on domestic violence. In my view, violence toward women and children is the most heinous act a man can commit. Period. The need to overwhelm a woman by exerting force leads me to conclude that there's a deeper problem with the people involved, more specifically with the man, and the nature of their relationship.

Though I am not married, I have had my share of quarrels with friends. The only way it is possible to have a healthy relationship is to curtail the ego and listen intently to one another. The act of beating your mate with the intent to cause bodily harm epitomizes a monster of an ego. The perception that a woman in marriage is property of the man is the root of the problem.

Every so often, I see men -- educated men -- who boast about not giving their wife the right to seek divorce. I don't particularly understand the thinking behind encaging a woman who wants a divorce. Perhaps, it's the sadistic mentality at play.

There's another facet of the "women as property" mindset that is hard to reckon with. Marital rape is seemingly quite common in Pakistan according to anecdotal evidence, though I don't have the statistics and there is no way to get an accurate number in a country where beating a woman is deemed OK, but filing a complaint against an abusive, overpowering husband is a taboo.

A woman may feel the dire need to protect another woman, but men should be equally concerned about the abuse of women.

Paradoxically, men who don't think twice about taking a swing at their wives often get worked up if a man beats the heck out of their loved one. You're a hypocrite if you think that it is OK for you to bash your wife, but not OK for your father to beat your mother or for your brother-in-law to beat your sister or for your son-in-law to beat your daughter. The woman you're married to is someone's daughter and most probably someone's sister. And it is very clear in my mind that you should treat others in the manner that you would like you and yours to be treated.

What irks me the most is when abusive husbands use religion as a license for beating (so to speak) ungrateful and disloyal women. Read the last sermon of the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, which says in clear words: "Treat your women well and be kind to them, for they are your partners and committed helpers." There is really no room for misinterpretation here.

Those men who mock their partners in life by saying that they've learned from the local mullah that there will be more women in hell because they disobey their husbands should consider reading up onwhat the religion actually says.

Turning a blind eye to the rights of women is an immense disservice to the woman who gave birth to you, your sisters, your lover and your daughter.

I have been thinking about how certain men perceive women since my college days. I remember a disturbing encounter with two men, from a feudal background, one of whom said: "Women are like toilet paper, we use them and trash them." I instantly asked: "What about your mother and sisters?" and the dynamic of the conversation dramatically changed.

That evening my mother saw me contemplating on a leather recliner in my lounge. If my memory serves me well, the year was 1999. That mind-shaping encounter led me to think about morals and ethics more deeply. And there is one thing I can say with finitude: Your life partner and your children are precious and should be treated in the manner you would treat something precious.

Read the rest of this entry »

(added last year!) / 373 views

Beliefs And Practices Of Hinduism

Posted in : Hinduism

(added last year!)

Hinduism is known as because the most ancient home faith within the planet. Using a special distinction of turning out to be the 3rd the majority of followed faith Hinduism Beliefs right after Christianity as well as Islam, this religion offers close to the million supporters globally. Primarily, this specific faith is observed within the Indian subcontinent in addition to aspects of south-east Asian countries. Nepal is going to be the mainly area within the earth, that has mentioned which Hinduism since the regular faith from the country. All of the admirers of Hinduism are known as Hindu. Hindi ‘language’ is originated via this kind of expression merely, as well as the identify Hindustan (India) will likely be the logical consequences of Hinduism.

The particular background of Hinduism is so historic, that there’s absolutely no document of that starting. In a few contexts, scholars believe that Hinduism were around simply prior to people found to reside in in the civil humanity. Previously, Hinduism might be tracked again in order to Vedic roots of historical Indian the world, without any kind of singular creator as these. A number of cultures as well as unlock iphone cultures inserted directly into this faith, to supply type towards the modern day faith along with most of these a large being successful.

The book of Hinduism usually are greatly dispersed amongst it’s supporters, and likewise possess a extremely stringent importance to your each day actions. Two of the most common varieties of scriptures are generally Sruti (the exposed) in addition to Smriti (the thought regarding) guides. The particular fundamental fundamentals of these scriptures are Sociology, Mythology, Viewpoint as well as Theology. Each one of these scriptures are generally in fact a guide to your accomplishment from the Dharma or maybe the rightful residing. The actual Vedas combined with the Upanishads are often most likely one of the most crucial of book of Hinduism. Ramayana could possibly coupons be the awesome epics which sorts the bottom of this kind of faith. Every member of your Hindu house remembers a lot of these epics off by heart, as well as the values of these are serious within the main of a precise Hindu. Along with, last and not the least; the Bhagvata Geeta will likely be the scripture, that really describes the real substance of Hinduism. It’s mentioned which Krishna, the Hindu God, himself study Geeta to save you time of Hindus.

Read the rest of this entry »

(added last year!) / 217 views

Lord Shiva...My Saviour

Posted in : Hinduism

(added last year!)

Lord Shiva has always been my sole source of happiness. Ever since i was a little child, i was used to hearing stories about the greatness of Lord Shiva and how he was always ready to rush to help his devotees. I have often felt the grace of Lord Shiva in my life and  would like to share my most memorable experience here.

I have the habit of going to a nearby Shiva temple on every sunday. During my undergraduate exam time, i used to go to the temple and pray on the way to my college. On the day of my Electronics paper examination, i started from my home a little early since i was particularly worried about the test. I went straight to the Shiva temple and did my usual prayers, but due to the crowd at the temple, i became a little late and the door in front of the idol was closed for the morning pooja while i was praying. I was in quite a dilemma, since i might be late for my exam if i wait for the door to open, but if i go while it is closed, i might fall prey to Lord Shiva's anger. I thought for a while and then decided to stay and pray, since i felt that Lord Shiva's blessings would help me overcome any possible problems.

After the pooja i hurried out of the temple. By this time it had started to rain. I was unable to get my usual bus and had to wait at the bus stop. After about 10 minutes, i decided to ask for a lift from people going on bikes. One particular gentleman stopped and agreed to help me. On the way to the college, the bike underwent an accident. Myself and the rider where thrown out of the bike and we landed onto the pavement as i shouted "mahadeva". When i got up, i realized that i had fallen onto a few cardboard boxes placed at the side and had just managed to miss an iron railing (with pointed tips) by a few inches. I didn't even have a scratch on me. My fellow rider had also miraculously escaped, while the bike was completely damaged.

By-standers were amazed at our escape and made us understand how fortunate we were. I thanked Lord Shiva with all my heart and knew that it was only his infinite grace which saved my life. After that i proceeded to my college. I was 20mins late for my examination and was quite sure that i would have to appear for an arrear in the exam. But ,i was baffled when i got 75% for that paper when the results came. I could not stop thanking Lord Shiva for his blessings and know that every time i spend even a second to pray, that Lord Shiva is really listening to me and is always there to help me.

Read the rest of this entry »

(added last year!) / 227 views

Using Islam to “Unite”

Posted in : Islam

(added last year!)

Today’s Pakistan displays strange contrasting patterns with respect to religion’s influence. Apparently Pakistan looks to be a relatively moderate country particularly when compared to the likes of Iran , Afghanistan , Saudi Arabia etc. Here the hardliners have never been voted in power through the ballot box. It has an independent media and relatively loose censorship standards. Radical Islam as a mode of life is still largely absent from the overall lifestyle of the Pakistanis as the country by no stretch of imagination is following the trajectory of Iran. It does not have the charismatic cultish religious leader like Khomeini and the public mood despite being conservative is hardly appreciative of hard line version of Islam when it comes to ballot box.

Anyone coming from abroad for the first time is generally bewildered at the contrast between what he actually sees and the ultra conservative picture often portrayed in the western media. At the same time, it is a country which is witnessing almost daily religiously inspired acts of extremism. Hardly a week passes without some major incidence. In pockets there are visible signs of social dominance of hard line Islam also. Moreover the controversial Islamic laws remain firmly entrenched in the legal framework and no party can dare to touch them no matter how popular it is.

It is a strange country which despite having violent version of radical Islam as the top most problem still does not have thoroughly radicalized population. This apparent contradiction, in my opinion owes to the way religion has been promoted by the state. The purpose was to not to radicalize the entire population but to somehow or the other propel religious identity into a dominant identity by relegating the ethnic identities. A lot has been written about political Islam and how so called establishment has fused it with the matters of state. In my opinion the use of Islam and its fusion with the law and its subsequent dominant presence in the educational curriculum has not been done to radicalize the population, but to somehow or the other make the obvious commonality dominant in such a way that ethnic identities are relegated. The idea was to create what is known as Civic nationalism.

 

Civic Nationalism does not have ethnicity as its prime determinant but rather tries to subdue the ethnic identities and cultivate allegiance to the “Country” instead. Failure to do it effectively may result in the breakup of the state.

Any country which at the time of its existence is multiethnic would try to cultivate Civic Nationalism and would exert efforts to manipulate identity is such a way that people would prefer to identify themselves first as nationals and then as members of a particular ethnic group. Theoretically and for that matter even ethically, there is nothing wrong with this concept. Civic Nationalism, if CORRECTLY, cultivated would smoothen out grievances and prevent discrimination on the basis of any ethnicity from emerging.

Complications start emerging when you try to cultivate Civic Nationalism in the wrong manner. In my opinion Pakistan’s present ethnic strife lies in the way we have tried to cultivate civic nationalism. Instead of integrating diverse ethnicities in a proper manner, we have tried to whip up the only common factor, Islam and supplemented it with coercive tactics whenever any ethnicity has raised its voice.

Now this kind of tactic may work when exclusion or discrimination is being conducted or perceived to be conducted on the basis of that common factor. Pakistan movement was successful mainly because in the pre partition times, it was perceived that Muslims are being relegated due to their faith and thus the identity based on faith superseded ethnic and linguistic identities and Muslims across the sub continent were able to unite in 1940s.

Once the country came into existence, this factor lost its rallying prowess. In a Muslim majority country which has sub sects also and is also characterized by various ethnicities and languages, religion cannot be a truly gluing force. Commonality of religion ( that too is dubious because in Pakistan we have sectarian rifts also) in the post partition times could not prove effective for the cultivation of civic nationalism.
However, instead of understanding this crucial difference between Pakistan movement and post partition times, our political leadership and establishment have always looked towards political as well as strategic usage of Islam to act as one of the unifying force. The consequences have been devastating as this approach though not radicalizing the entire population has created pockets of extremists. Moreover the religion has assumed a kind of reverence that despite the fact that majority of the population remains moderate, any religon inspired law does not face any potent oppposition. This has actually made clergy much more powerful than what the electoral results suggest.
Diverse ethnicities may associate themselves with a federation due to some common factor in the beginning but in the longer run they will associate with the federation, if they are convinced that they are getting a right mix of economic advantages and political autonomy. It has to be remembered that identity based on language and race may become dormant at times but it does not simply disappear. Whereas it is desirable that people should identify themselves with the “country” at the same time it is not possible that their ethnic identities will simply vanish.

Although it is often said that objective resolution is what started it, but in reality the religion’s material incorporation in laws started after 1971. Yes, objective resolution provides the basis or what you would call a “blue print” but the actual and effective fusion of religion with constitution and matters of state came after the East Pakistan debacle. Let’s not forget that Ayub Khan’s regime was largely secular. For keeping the state intact Ayub largely relied on over centralization characterized by one unit scheme and letting centre keep the major chunk of the revenue. Obviously this had severe repercussions as the Bengalis felt discriminated against and Ayub Khan Regime retorted by coercive measures such as initiating cases against Bengali leadership. After the 1970 election, when despite clear majority, Bengalis were denied the right to assume the government; military action took place followed by Indian invasion.

Instead of realizing the true essence of the issue, which was autonomy on ethnic lines, and giving greater economic share, our political leadership as well as establishment assumed that the rest of the West Pakistan could be kept intact through continuing centralization and cultivating an identity based on fusion of Islam and Pakistani nationalism. It was assumed that Islam would somehow or the other “replace” or at least be able relegate the ethnic identities. It was that defeat which actually spurred serious efforts towards strategic use of political Islam.

It is ironic that arguably the most intelligent political leader, Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, who had in fact led a social cum political movement against excesses of Ayub era and had witnessed the carnage of the crackdown against Bengalis, was one of the prime initiators of this process.

There is absolutely no doubt that 1973 constitution was a giant stride forward towards fusion of religion in the matters of state. More than anything else it also set the future constitutional direction of the country.

Second amendment, which in my opinion is one of the blackest laws ever passed, actually becomes defendable when strictly seen in the light of 1973 constitution. The political leadership in its eventual aim of keeping the country “intact” started to aggressively cultivate Islamic brand of Pakistani nationalism. After Bhutto Zia government further accelerated the drive and introduced two more black ordinances, namely Hadood and Anti Blasphemy. Of course the entire educational curriculum was also changed and made Islamic and Pakistan studies compulsory. Both the subjects were and in fact still taught in a total biased and uncritical manner. The changes in educational curriculum have primarily been effective with urban middleclass, which by and large has become more conservative. This class may not have become radicalized but at the same time has begun more and more to identify itself with the state cultivated image of Islam. But even here despite increasing religiosity the state was not able to successfully subdue sub state ethnicities.

The governments did not try to address the real reasons behind ethnic rifts and consequently it is hardly surprising that although religious extremism in the country has increased but so has the ethnic strife. Fusion of religion with the matters of state and that too in a country where there are no liberal traditions of rational discourse on religion, would only lead to further intensification of religious extremism. In the absence of any such tradition any Shariah law once in place would be almost impossible to repeal. And they have proven impossible to repeal. All efforts to repeal any of the controversial laws (apart from Hudood ordinance which was only partially repealed in 2006) have not gone beyond some newspaper statements which too were subsequently retracted.

Of course even if the state had not instilled these laws, the changes it made in educational sphere to promote extraordinary reverence for religion would have still done substantial damage to the culture of tolerance in Pakistan. But the laws brought in the state’s coercive power into play and consequently bigotry and religious inspired extremism has been institutionalized.

The strategic use of political Islam to tackle ethnicity and also to gain other advantages continued into the 1990s and Taliban were created. Apart from creating so called strategic depth, another rationale for promotion of Taliban was to tackle the issue of Pushtun nationalism. It was assumed that a radical Islamic force with its presence in both Afghanistan and Pakistan would stifle Puktun Nationalism also. Needless to say that today we are paying a heavy price for that blunder.

Instead of unity the political use of Islam has sown extremism and sectarian violence. One has to understand that religion too is not homogeneously interpreted and once you try to unite through religion, this fact becomes a chief obstacle as you have to decide which interpretation to use. You cannot use multiple interpretations at the same time and using one version of Islam generally leads to sectarian rift which precisely has happened in Pakistan. Moreover, it has further intensified religious bigotry against minorities. In the past one year, we have seen attacks against Sufi shrines, Shites, Ahmedis and Christians. Moreover, draconian laws are still in place and in fact repealing them will perhaps increase violence because of resistance of the religious clergy who have become just too powerful because of active promotion by the state in the past.

The state as well as the educated of this country has to realize that we can not suffer more of these blunders. Ethnic rifts can only be tackled through greater autonomy and fairer economic distribution. An ethnicity will prefer to call itself a Pakistani first only if it does not feel excluded. A state that excludes sows the seed of its nemesis. You will create ten other problems if you think that religion can somehow or the other unify.

One of the reasons as to why I support decentralization and greater autonomy of provinces is that it would automatically lead to weakening of state promoted Islam. This is an important point because if Islam is indeed being used to centralize then an effort in the contrary direction would weaken its role and effect.

Read the rest of this entry »

(added last year!) / 203 views

Hindus Upset Over Asura's Wrath

Posted in : Hinduism

(added last year!)

Hindus Upset Over Asura's WrathI don't know much about Hinduism or Asura's Wrath, but a quick glance at Wikipedia tells me that the game "takes elements from Hindu mythology and blends them with science fiction." I guess that would explain why Rajan Zed, the president of the Universal Society of Hinduism, is none too happy with the game. In a press release, Zed said that "such trivializing and reimagining of highly revered symbols and concepts of Hinduism was not okay as it is upsetting for the devotees."

Durga, the murdered wife of Asura in Asura's Wrath, is actually a major Hindu deity who destroyed the buffalo-demon Mahisasura, a well-known asura - a power-seeking deity mostly living in ancient South India, again according to Wiki, sometimes considered sinful and materialistic. Zed acknowledged that freedom of expression is "important" but added that faith is sacred, and game developers should be more sensitive when dealing with such matters. If developers cannot "accurately and authentically deliver religious imagery and symbolism," he said, then they should not "unnecessarily poke into religion."

"No faith, large or small, should be plundered," Zed said. Refreshingly, he did not threaten an international boycott of Capcom, Sony, Microsoft or anyone else; instead, he said that he or other Hindu scholars "would gladly provide genuine seekers from [the] videogames industry the resources they needed for their study and research regarding Hinduism."

Hinduism is the oldest and third-largest of the world's major religions, with an estimated one billion adherents around the world. Asura's Wrath has a Metacritic score of 73, and is available now for the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3.

Read the rest of this entry »

(added last year!) / 341 views

The Islamic Solution to Stop Domestic Violence

Posted in : Islam

(added last year!)

Critics incorrectly allege that Islam command's husband's to beat their wives, often citing the Quran verse 4:34. Unfortunately, like any Muslim man who harms his wife, critics miss the keen wisdom in verse 4:34 that actively pre-empts domestic violence.

In Virginia, I provide pro bono legal support to victims of domestic and sexual violence. Virtually all of our clients are female. Every nine seconds -- nearly 10,000 victims daily -- a woman in the United States is abused. In America, domestic violence is the leading cause of injury to women, more than car accidents, muggings and rape -- combined. Would those who blame Islam for domestic violence also blame Christianity every nine seconds?

Before addressing this question, consider Dr. James Q. Wilson's perspective -- America's pre-eminent social scientist. He cites the medical fact that the part of the brain that stimulates anger and aggression is larger in men than in women. Likewise, the part of the brain that restrains anger is smaller in men than in women. Simply put, men are far more prone to violence and far less capable of self-restraint than women.

But this is not a "cop out" argument. Part of the problem is that our laws only punish men after the violence has already occurred. We implement educational and rehabilitation programs to decrease and diminish other illnesses, allowing the individual to function in society without harm to him or herself or to others. Likewise, stopping domestic violence means acting to eliminate even initial infractions.

Pre-emptive deterrence is the key. And this precisely is the wisdom behind verse 4:34 to decrease and stop violence against women. The verse in its totality describes a process of restraint, anger management and reformation.

The verse begins by defining a family unit, holding the husband accountable as the household's guardian and provider. This obligation gives him certain authority, privileges and a requirement of magnanimity -- but never the right to employ domestic violence. The verse then urges women to also act virtuously, and protect the family unit by cooperating with their husband, listening to him in all good things and to not publicize private family matters.

Next, verse 4:34 employs the process of anger management, reformation and reconciliation. This process may only be employed after a wife has initially and deliberately undermined or attempted to destroy the family, as indicated by the words, "as for those on whose part you fear disobedience." But "disobedience" does not mean any random disagreement a wife may have with her husband. Arabic lexicon provides the correct understanding as that of a wife who has deserted her husband altogether or has unjustly attempted to destroy the family. Once a wife deliberately engages in this form of behavior, then the Quran describes a process to peacefully reconcile the dispute.

The first step, anger management, obliges the husband to merely admonish his wife of his concern, essentially encouraging the parties to admit that a problem exists. This forces a man to strictly control himself in hopes that his wife will also incline to reconciliation. Should this fail, the second step is separating beds for up to four months. This act further diminishes the chances of domestic violence, as a man physically separates himself from the emotionally charged situation for an extended period of time. If the wife engaged in an action to which the husband over reacted, then his extended time apart will help him realize the foolishness of his own behavior. Likewise, if the wife indeed engaged in an improper act, then her husband's separation will encourage her to realize the unreasonableness of her behavior. Either way, this step avoids violence altogether while actively promoting reconciliation.

Employed effectively, these two steps help reconcile the vast majority of domestic disputes. Should the first two steps fail, however, the Quran allows -- never commands -- men to consider the third step, translated as "to chastise them." But to understand "chastise" as sanctioning violence ignores the lengthy process employed in the first two steps to eliminate violence, the proper meaning and scope of "chastise," and the precedent of peaceful reconciliation Prophet Muhammad himself established.

First, it is unmerited to suggest that the Quran requires such extensive lengths to avoid violence, only to ultimately permit it.

Next, Arabic lexicon demonstrates that the word translated "chastise," i.e. daraba, employs definitions like "to heal," having nothing to do with violence. While daraba may also mean, "to strike," the proper scope of "strike" is best understood through Prophet Muhammad's example. Prophet Muhammad explained that for that man incapable of controlling his anger -- the first two required restrictions notwithstanding -- any act, such as a "strike," must heal and "not so much as to leave a mark."

Elaborating on this, Prophet Muhammad explicitly admonished Muslims, "Do not beat your wives." He led by example and never struck his wives, therefore demonstrating in word and in deed that Muslim men cannot harm women for any reason.

As an alternative, Islam also encourages arbitration to actively foster reconciliation while reducing and eliminating the chances for domestic violence.

Thus, verse 4:34 describes a human nature-based process of reducing environmental triggers and curbing biological urges. This verse forces men to control their anger, remove themselves from emotionally charged situations that may lead to domestic violence, while admonishing women to also incline towards reconciliation.

As for women who fear harm from their husbands, Islam gives women an even easier path: demand their husbands stop their egregious behavior, or file for divorce. Islam was the first religion and Prophet Muhammad was the first statesman to ensure women had the right to unilaterally divorce. A Muslim man who violates his duties to protect, provide and care for his wife risks losing his wife altogether, while still being liable to provide for her financially. The Quran ensured these protections to women 1,400 years ago. Thus, Muslim men who abuse women do so in spite of the Quran, ignoring the Quran's required and lengthy pre-emptive methods to peacefully reconcile.

Finally, remember that domestic violence occurs because men let their anger rule their behavior. If the nearly 10,000 American women who are abused daily received the pre-emptive protections that verse 4:34 offers, then how many women would actually be subject to domestic violence at all?

Read the rest of this entry »

(added last year!) / 318 views